http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55460
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55460
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-25
00:49:05 UTC ---
// NOTE: call to filter depends on template argument, thus have to be
// resolved at instantiation point.
// BUG: But it doesn't!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55460
--- Comment #2 from Yuriy Solodkyy solodon at mail dot com 2012-11-25
01:07:36 UTC ---
Not sure I understand your comment - ADL with respect to what: my::filter or
the ::operator? Can you elaborate please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55460
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-25
01:56:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Not sure I understand your comment - ADL with respect to what: my::filter or
the ::operator? Can you elaborate please?