http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 27 16:20:59 2014
New Revision: 208200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208200root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/60353
PR c++/55877
* decl2.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 25 21:19:06 2014
New Revision: 208157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208157root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/55877
* decl2.c (no_linkage_error):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Can we close this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No, the #c4 testcase is still a regression from 4.4, verified using latest
trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.4