http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11
12:42:52 UTC ---
You keep quoting Stroustrup but your code is still broken.
Your clone() function copies the object. The object is not copyable. What is
so difficult
++/56889] =delete(ing) default copy and move operations for a
polymorphic type gives compilation error messages
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-11
12:42:52 UTC ---
You keep quoting Stroustrup but your code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-04-09 09:36:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
In addition I would like to remark that the precise declaration state of the
inherited initializer-list constructor in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
.
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
To: amalispe...@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2013 10:26 PM
Subject: [Bug c++/56889] =delete(ing) default copy and move operations for a
polymorphic type gives compilation error messages
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56889
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-04-09 19:13:55 UTC ---
This issue is not the right place for discussing programming idioms, but as a
last comment to the code: Your reference to PL alone does not
in draft form with the permission of the publisher. D R A F T
thanks,
Amali.
From: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
To: amalispe...@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2013 7:10 PM
Subject: [Bug c++/56889] =delete(ing) default copy and move
