http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58713
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
I've tried to improve it in the past, but I think there's no easy way to do
it.
A possible fix might be to change the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58713
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If I try to sfinae-out this function based on osx being well-formed, I get an
error that template instantiation depth exceeds maximum of 900 (even for a
valid cout42), because even if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58713
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4)
If I try to sfinae-out this function based on osx being well-formed, I get
an error that template instantiation depth exceeds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58713
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #5)
Thanks for your test, Marc. I will reflect upon the problem in a bit more
detail
My current guess is that my suggested
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58713
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #3)
guess is that this would also improve the diagnostics in this case, is that
right?
Even if it worked (which it doesn't, as Marc also
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58713
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58713
--- Comment #2 from Ali Baharev ali.baharev at gmail dot com ---
Why do the 32 and 64 bit versions behave differently?
They don't. I think maybe you forgot to use -std=c++11 in the first case?
Yes, that's what happened. Sorry, my mistake.
