http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to hubert.vansteenhuyse from comment #3)
Of course it is, the example is merely a pseudo code to make clear what
happened.
Didn't you read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
hubert.vansteenhuyse at freecode dot be changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #1 from hubert.vansteenhuyse at freecode dot be ---
struct A {
A *a[2];
A() { a[0] = 0; a[1] = 0; }
~A(){ if(a[0]) delete a[0]; if(a[1]) delete a[1];
}
void main(){
A *a = new A();
a-a[0] = new A();
a-a[1] = new A();
delete a;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #3 from hubert.vansteenhuyse at freecode dot be ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2)
Your example is bogus: { and } don't match, main must return int, etc. If I
fix it so it compiles, I don't see any crash.
Of course it is,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to hubert.vansteenhuyse from comment #3)
Of course it is, the example is merely a pseudo code to make clear what
happened.
That's my point, pseudo-code is useless, if we
