[Bug c++/64235] Internal compiler error (Segmentation fault)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64235 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Jun 21 20:26:54 2019 New Revision: 272570 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272570&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/64235 - missing syntax error with invalid alignas. * parser.c (cp_parser_std_attribute_spec): Commit to tentative parse if there's a missing close paren. * g++.dg/parse/alignas1.C: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/alignas1.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug c++/64235] Internal compiler error (Segmentation fault)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64235 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed.
[Bug c++/64235] Internal compiler error (Segmentation fault)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64235 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01185.html
[Bug c++/64235] Internal compiler error (Segmentation fault)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64235 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
[Bug c++/64235] Internal compiler error (Segmentation fault)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64235 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code | CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- No longer ICEs, but cc1plus still accepts it.
[Bug c++/64235] Internal compiler error (Segmentation fault)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, ||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2014-12-09 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail||4.8.3, 4.9.2, 5.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed the ice-on-invalid. But more importantly g++ 4.9 and 5 accept the code without complaining...