[Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases

2015-02-13 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases

2015-02-13 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #3) #if !defined(__GXX_ABI_VERSION) || __GXX_ABI_VERSION != 1002 #error The C++ ABI version of compiler you are using does not match #error

[Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases

2015-02-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases

2015-02-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Fri Feb 13 05:26:37 2015 New Revision: 220675 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220675root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/64956 * c-opts.c

[Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases

2015-02-09 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- I found this snippet in one of the xapian headers. #ifdef __GNUC__ #if __GNUC__ 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 __GNUC_MINOR__ == 0) #error Xapian no longer supports GCC 3.1 #else #if

[Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases

2015-02-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/64956] [5 Regression] __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the 5.x releases

2015-02-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, -fabi-version=0 (which is the default now) has always behaved that way. The question is if we want to change that or not.