https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65448
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I was going to suggest to use json diagnostic format
(-fdiagnostics-format=json) with newer GCC but I noticed it does not output the
header include stack (which I filed as PR 107941 ).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65448
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Actually I'm using gcc since about 2.6 version and I cannot recall any tool
that understands these In file included from messages.
Emacs has always handled them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65448
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Michal Malecki from comment #2)
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1)
Which tools? Shouldn't those tools be fixed instead?
The problem is that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65448
--- Comment #2 from Michal Malecki ethouris at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1)
Which tools? Shouldn't those tools be fixed instead?
The problem is that it's very easy to interpret the format that every line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65448
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
