[Bug c++/65539] temp/ccCAfJgj.ltrans1.ltrans.o: In function `XSDFrontend::Traversal::EdgeXSDFrontend::SemanticGraph::Names::~Edge()': /usr/include/xsd-frontend/traversal/elements.hxx:120: undefined

2015-03-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65539 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/65539] temp/ccCAfJgj.ltrans1.ltrans.o: In function `XSDFrontend::Traversal::EdgeXSDFrontend::SemanticGraph::Names::~Edge()': /usr/include/xsd-frontend/traversal/elements.hxx:120: undefined

2015-03-24 Thread nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65539 David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/65539] temp/ccCAfJgj.ltrans1.ltrans.o: In function `XSDFrontend::Traversal::EdgeXSDFrontend::SemanticGraph::Names::~Edge()': /usr/include/xsd-frontend/traversal/elements.hxx:120: undefined

2015-03-24 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65539 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- If those were built with earlier versions of GCC 5 with LTO, then yes, I think we don't track day to day changes in LTO format, only for the released compilers.