https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 20:20:00 2017
New Revision: 255703
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255703=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/80135
PR c++/81922
* typeck2.c (digest_init_r):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Untested WIP patch attached to PR81922.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The glibc people should know (or you can try building glibc).
That said, I think rejecting structs with flexible array members is
unnecessary, e.g. the C FE doesn't reject them either, what we should reject
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
I'll see what I can do. You had some concerns with rejecting this code in bug
78635 comment 9. Presumably you have resolved those to your own satisfaction?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can you please find time for that during GCC 8 stage3/stage4?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, Jason and I agreed that arrays of structs with flexible array members
should be rejected (thus ice-on-invalid-code). It was not my intend to accept
this code. I just haven't gotten around to fixing it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.4 |6.5
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
