[Bug c++/83796] [6/7/8 Regression] Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor

2018-02-01 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796 --- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Feb 1 15:36:04 2018 New Revision: 257298 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257298=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2018-02-01 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/83796] [6/7/8 Regression] Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor

2018-01-24 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/83796] [6/7/8 Regression] Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor

2018-01-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.5

[Bug c++/83796] [6/7/8 Regression] Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor

2018-01-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Actually I think it's r194284 commit 6fb305c7c88b07c429e8a39fbd514a417c5b6127 Author: jason Date: Fri Dec 7 04:54:27 2012 + PR c++/54325

[Bug c++/83796] [6/7/8 Regression] Abstract classes allowed to be instantiated when initialised as default parameter to function or constructor

2018-01-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83796 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|