https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 21 22:12:08 2018
New Revision: 257883
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257883&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84314 - ICE with templates and fastcall attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 15 16:54:12 2018
New Revision: 257695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84314 - ICE with templates and fastcall attribute.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 43416
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43416&action=edit
patch
Patch awaiting review.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Ah, this isn't a lambda issue at all; replacing the lambda with 0 doesn't avoid
the ICE. It seems to be a templates/attributes issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> This still ICEs with current trunk, unlike PR84296, which is indeed fixed.
I can't reproduce this; I just get some (correct) warnings.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84314
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
10 matches
Mail list logo