[Bug c++/88757] [9 Regression] GCC wrongly treats dependent name as a type when it should be treated as a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88757 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88757] [9 Regression] GCC wrongly treats dependent name as a type when it should be treated as a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88757 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 23 17:25:42 2019 New Revision: 268192 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268192=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/88757 - qualified name treated wrongly as type. *

[Bug c++/88757] [9 Regression] GCC wrongly treats dependent name as a type when it should be treated as a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88757 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/88757] [9 Regression] GCC wrongly treats dependent name as a type when it should be treated as a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88757 --- Comment #2 from d25fe0be@ --- Oops, I didn't realize this. Thank you for clarifying.

[Bug c++/88757] [9 Regression] GCC wrongly treats dependent name as a type when it should be treated as a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88757 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/88757] [9 Regression] GCC wrongly treats dependent name as a type when it should be treated as a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88757 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/88757] [9 Regression] GCC wrongly treats dependent name as a type when it should be treated as a value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88757 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---