[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-18 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 --- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Mar 18 21:22:30 2019 New Revision: 269781 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269781=gcc=rev Log: Add a test for PR c++/89630 PR c++/89630 *

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Mar 18 19:37:00 2019 New Revision: 269777 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269777=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/89630 - ICE with dependent using-decl as template arg. Even though

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-18 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jakub at redhat dot com|jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, ok, I was trying -march=skylake-avx512, but not -mrtm, now I can reproduce. As this is not a bootstrapped compiler, it can't be miscompiled, so I bet all my patch changed is adding a few DECL_UIDs (for

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > In a non-bootstrapped compiler I certainly can't reproduce, nor reproduced > it in bootstrap when I've tested the patch. How exactly have you configured > your

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- In a non-bootstrapped compiler I certainly can't reproduce, nor reproduced it in bootstrap when I've tested the patch. How exactly have you configured your compiler?

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/89630] [9 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-64.C

2019-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89630 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|