https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #13 from Timothee Besset ---
Fix proposed in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95883
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
Timothee Besset changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ttimo at valvesoftware dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:166c024a1969ca9e77ed450fb65ce5c926a315dc
commit r9-8318-g166c024a1969ca9e77ed450fb65ce5c926a315dc
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:245e40af4fab5b7cf40fb310591a879355775971
commit r10-6335-g245e40af4fab5b7cf40fb310591a879355775971
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #9 from frankhb1989 at gmail dot com ---
This seems still problematic.
void test1() {
[]() __attribute__((noreturn)) noexcept [[]] -> int{
return 0; // Warning expected.
}();
}
void test2() {
[]() noexcept [[]]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Nov 2 06:53:53 2019
New Revision: 277741
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=277741=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/89640
* parser.c (cp_parser_decl_specifier_seq): Don't parse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 18 19:34:47 2019
New Revision: 269775
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269775=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/89640 - GNU attributes on lambda.
My patch for PR 60503 to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #4 from Mathias Stearn ---
@Jakub, This code doesn't have either mutable or noexcept, so the "wrong place
in the grammer" issue doesn't apply. That part of the fix seems correct and
useful.
While it seems correct to fix what the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
--- Comment #2 from Mathias Stearn ---
Unfortunately the c++ attributes syntax applies to the lambda type rather than
the function, so the warning is correct. The old style __attribute__ syntax
seems to be the only way to annotate the lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89640
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
15 matches
Mail list logo
