[Bug c++/89668] make[2]: autogen: Command not found
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89668 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Pei JIA from comment #4) > I just strictly follow > http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/gcc.html, > > and I'm using the following command line: > > su nobody -s /bin/bash -c "PATH=$PATH make -k check" > > > Should I do: > > su nobody -s /bin/bash -c "PATH=$PATH make -k -j8 check" instead?? I'd also add RUNTESTFLAGS=-v
[Bug c++/89668] make[2]: autogen: Command not found
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89668 --- Comment #4 from Pei JIA --- I just strictly follow http://linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/gcc.html, and I'm using the following command line: su nobody -s /bin/bash -c "PATH=$PATH make -k check" Should I do: su nobody -s /bin/bash -c "PATH=$PATH make -k -j8 check" instead??
[Bug c++/89668] make[2]: autogen: Command not found
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89668 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- You can also look at the progress by tail -f gcc.log or gcc.sum if you want. But yes there are many testcases which causes this to be slow especially if you are not using -j.
[Bug c++/89668] make[2]: autogen: Command not found
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89668 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- This doesn't seem like a bug. If you have questions, please use the gcc-help mailing list, not a bug report.
[Bug c++/89668] make[2]: autogen: Command not found
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89668 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Pei JIA from comment #0) > So, my questions are: > > Is make[2]: autogen: Command not found an ERROR? Is autogen required? This seems pretty clearly documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html > Is WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. an ERROR? It looks > like it's just a harmless warning, right? You can ignore it. > Any suggestions? Should I just wait? But, it's already been hours There are thousands and thousands of tests. You probably should have told make to run multiple jobs at once, using the -j option and an argument.