[Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0296697cf9893dc9509cdcd8e3fd4ba9fe422527 commit r9-8623-g0296697cf9893dc9509cdcd8e3fd4ba9fe422527 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Mon May 25 18:38:09 2020 -0400 c++: constexpr and lambda capture [PR90212] This is the same issue as PR86429, just in potential_constant_expression_1 rather than cxx_eval_constant_expression. As in that case, when we're trying to evaluate a constant expression within a lambda, we don't have a constant closure object to refer to, but we can try to refer directly to the captured variable. gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2020-05-05 Jason Merrill PR c++/90212 * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): In a lambda function, consider a captured variable directly.
[Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa613a81831bdc044840a95a7a7803a235608503 commit r10-8183-gaa613a81831bdc044840a95a7a7803a235608503 Author: Jason Merrill Date: Mon May 25 18:04:39 2020 -0400 c++: constexpr and lambda capture [PR90212] This is the same issue as PR86429, just in potential_constant_expression_1 rather than cxx_eval_constant_expression. As in that case, when we're trying to evaluate a constant expression within a lambda, we don't have a constant closure object to refer to, but we can try to refer directly to the captured variable. gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2020-05-05 Jason Merrill PR c++/90212 * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): In a lambda function, consider a captured variable directly.
[Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04b89192ace3a766a17374d5bef8fb19d9be2d7c commit r11-122-g04b89192ace3a766a17374d5bef8fb19d9be2d7c Author: Jason Merrill Date: Tue May 5 17:39:19 2020 -0400 c++: constexpr and lambda capture [PR90212] This is the same issue as PR86429, just in potential_constant_expression_1 rather than cxx_eval_constant_expression. As in that case, when we're trying to evaluate a constant expression within a lambda, we don't have a constant closure object to refer to, but we can try to refer directly to the captured variable. gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2020-05-05 Jason Merrill PR c++/90212 * constexpr.c (potential_constant_expression_1): In a lambda function, consider a captured variable directly.
[Bug c++/90212] [8/9/10/11 Regression] by-ref capture of constexpr class object rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
