https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfffecb802681fbdb56629d3bdd96491ac660be0
commit r10-6572-gdfffecb802681fbdb56629d3bdd96491ac660be0
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aaa26bf496a646778ac861aed124d960b5bf549f
commit r10-6527-gaaa26bf496a646778ac861aed124d960b5bf549f
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.2 |9.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > Started with r270136. I'd say we should stop considering
> > -fcompare-debug=-W* as bugs, after all, it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Started with r270136. I'd say we should stop considering
> -fcompare-debug=-W* as bugs, after all, it is extremely unlikely we are
> going to fix those anyway,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
--- Comment #2 from Roman Lebedev ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Confirmed.
Note that this isn't just about constants, but about the evaluation
of constant-range of the signed operand.
E.g. '(b ? 10 : 9)' is not a constant,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90691
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, needs-bisection
