https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91950
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> > I think this is actually a dup of another bug that asked the same thing, but
> > I forget its number...
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91950
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> I think this is actually a dup of another bug that asked the same thing, but
> I forget its number...
There are dozens of them, because nobody understands how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91950
--- Comment #3 from John Boyer ---
Actually, I believe Jonathan is correct. I misread the CWG. The "range" of an
enum class has nothing to do with how many enumerators it has.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91950
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91950
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
