[Bug c++/94644] Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in a template first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94644 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/94644] Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in a template first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94644 Bug 94644 depends on bug 41437, which changed state. Bug 41437 Summary: No access control for classes in template functions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/94644] Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in a template first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94644 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||41437 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/94644] Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in a template first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94644 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler --- (In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #2) > PR 94033 is also related to constructibity trait testing with an > inaccessible constructor. Looks like the intrinsic depends on where it was > evaluated. Indeed

[Bug c++/94644] Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in a template first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94644 Avi Kivity changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@cloudius-systems.com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/94644] Wrong is_nothrow_move_constructible result if used in a template first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94644 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.