https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95307
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95307
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eeb54a14c48f543857f561556ab1fc49dc21af26
commit r11-893-geeb54a14c48f543857f561556ab1fc49dc21af26
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95307
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've tried:
--- gcc/cp/constexpr.c.jj 2020-05-25 10:06:59.886175941 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/constexpr.c 2020-05-26 22:02:23.661355854 +0200
@@ -6196,6 +6196,18 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95307
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
And related to bug 93955.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95307
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Blo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95307
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For - 0 it is diagnosed by:
/* Technically we should check this for all subexpressions, but that
runs into problems with our internal representation of pointer
subtraction and the 5.19 rules are s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95307
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95307
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.