[Bug c++/95820] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_late_return_type, at cp/pt.c:29034

[slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820

Sergei Trofimovich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|10.2|11.0

--- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich  ---
Oh, that makes sense. Adjusting the Target to 11.0.

I don't feel strongly about it either. We did not get reports until 10.2, so
maybe it's not that frequent.

[Bug c++/95820] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_late_return_type, at cp/pt.c:29034

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820

--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek  ---
We usually don't backport fixed for ices-on-invalid but I could be convinced in
this case.

[Bug c++/95820] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_late_return_type, at cp/pt.c:29034

[slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820

Sergei Trofimovich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich  ---
In https://bugs.gentoo.org/730406 we see it on gcc-10.2.0 as well. Minimal
example:

$ cat a.cc
template decltype(0)
$ LANG=C gcc-10.2.0 a.cc
a.cc:1:21: internal compiler error: in splice_late_return_type, at
cp/pt.c:29152

Should it be backported to gcc-10?

[Bug c++/95820] [10 Regression] ICE in splice_late_return_type, at cp/pt.c:29034

[mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95820

Marek Polacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in   |[10 Regression] ICE in
   |splice_late_return_type, at |splice_late_return_type, at
   |cp/pt.c:29034   |cp/pt.c:29034
 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek  ---
Fixed in GCC 11.