[Bug c++/95963] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

2020-07-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95963

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Fixed.

[Bug c++/95963] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

2020-06-30 Thread webrown.cpp at gmail dot com 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95963

W E Brown  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||webrown.cpp at gmail dot com

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8dc933c12f489626339b3ba1a8e2dc23eb4de98e

commit r11-1728-g8dc933c12f489626339b3ba1a8e2dc23eb4de98e
Author: Jakub Jelinek 
Date:   Tue Jun 30 11:42:54 2020 +0200

c-family: Avoid ICEs on calls to internal functions [PR95963]

The following testcase ICEs since recent Martin's -Wnonnull changes,
we see a CALL_EXPR and ICE because CALL_EXPR_FN is NULL, which is
valid for internal function calls.  Internal function calls don't have a
function type, and will never have format_arg attribute on them nor will
serve as the i18n routines -Wformat cares about.

2020-06-30  Jakub Jelinek  

PR c++/95963
* c-common.c (check_function_arguments_recurse): Don't crash on
calls to internal functions.

* g++.dg/cpp1z/launder9.C: New test.

[Bug c++/95963] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

2020-06-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95963

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |11.0

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Started with r11-1697

[Bug c++/95963] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

2020-06-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95963

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
5818  if (TREE_CODE (param) == CALL_EXPR)
5819{
5820  tree type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (CALL_EXPR_FN (param)));
We should add && CALL_EXPR_FN (param) to the condition.  I'll handle it.