https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97197
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97197
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7790a71c07029546110a039f47611dfa967adc51
commit r10-8900-g7790a71c07029546110a039f47611dfa967adc51
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97197
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac1c65ad1a16d83ec63674efa07c00b062562f15
commit r11-3659-gac1c65ad1a16d83ec63674efa07c00b062562f15
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97197
--- Comment #4 from David Fink ---
Hi Jakub,
I tried to reduce the code as much as possible before reporting, which is why
the example has the "this != " check in the copy constructor.
The original code where I saw this problem had the "this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97197
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97197
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97197
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0