https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107890
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107890
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is always a trade off here.
We made the decision that signed integer overflow is undefined because we want
to do optimizations. Gcc does provide an option which makes them behave well
defined at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107890
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107890
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You should read https://blog.regehr.org/archives/213
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
