https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108476
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108476
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108476
--- Comment #3 from Alex Henrie ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Note the warning should really be split into two different options. One for
> the return type of the declaration and one for the missing return in
> non-void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108476
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
