https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108531
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
My only real addition to my previous comments in the referenced glibc bug
report is that, given we defined _Float32 which has the same "not promoted
at language level in variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108531
--- Comment #5 from Keith Thompson ---
FYI, I've sent an email to the C standard editors (the addresses at
the top of the N3054 draft) suggesting that imaginary number support
should be optional even if __STDC_IEC_559_COMPLEX__ and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108531
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
LLVM side: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60269
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108531
--- Comment #3 from Keith Thompson ---
In the latest C2X draft,
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3054.pdf
Annex G still requires imaginary number support for any implementation
that defines __STDC_IEC_60559_COMPLEX__ or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108531
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
C2x changes this ... (so does TS 18661-1 ) so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108531
--- Comment #1 from Keith Thompson ---
After I submitted this, I found that this is probably a duplicate of:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15720
(I disagree with the resolution of that bug report.)
