https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:857a6ee25ff5cbb97715de4dd97e1641285c6085
commit r14-4804-g857a6ee25ff5cbb97715de4dd97e1641285c6085
Author: Florian Weimer
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The warning is not even controlled by an option either so only -Werror turns it
into an error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109826
--- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer ---
I guess the main issue here is that the common type void * for both the second
and third operand is implicitly converted to many pointer types, including the
original types of those operands. So while
