[Bug c/114773] Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID --- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao --- Oops, the mouse scroll wheel is too sensitive and I selected the wrong resolution :(.
[Bug c/114773] Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao --- Then this isn't a valid bug report.
[Bug c/114773] Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773 --- Comment #4 from Sirraide --- Yeah, we figured that that was why they’re not supported in `-gnu89` mode, but I thought I’d ask just to be sure.
[Bug c/114773] Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
-std=gnu89 is meant for really old programs, and the raw string literal support
changes behavior, so it isn't a pure extension on what wasn't valid before,
e.g. consider
#define R
#define b
const char * square(void) {
return R"(a"b"a)";
}
in -std=c89 or -std=gnu89 this is return "(aa)"; while in -std=gnu99 return
"a\"b\"a";
[Bug c/114773] Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773 --- Comment #2 from Sirraide --- Thanks!
[Bug c/114773] Raw string literals are not supported in C89 mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114773 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html Looks like it is on purpose: C++0x raw strings are supported for C++ and for C with -std=gnu99. https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20080912132007.ga9...@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com/
