--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-16 16:29 ---
Subject: Bug 28368
Author: manu
Date: Sat Feb 16 16:29:12 2008
New Revision: 132367
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132367
Log:
2008-02-16 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-16 18:16 ---
Subject: Bug 28368
Author: manu
Date: Sat Feb 16 18:15:20 2008
New Revision: 132368
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=132368
Log:
2008-02-16 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-16 18:20 ---
The new description in GCC 4.3 and GCC 4.2.4 should clarify this from now on.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-18 12:09 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This is also true for C++ unless -pedantic is specified (which is confusing
since I thought -pedantic-errors was the default for C++, but apparently this
changed at some point). Using '-Wall
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 15:52 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Subject: Re: -std=c89 doesn't warn about gcc's ?: extension
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Sorry, I still don't understand what is the difference between
--- Comment #1 from lloyd at randombit dot net 2007-03-07 14:47 ---
This is also true for C++ unless -pedantic is specified (which is confusing
since I thought -pedantic-errors was the default for C++, but apparently this
changed at some point). Using '-Wall -Wextra -ansi -std=c++98'
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 17:57 ---
The documentation says that you should use -pedantic to warn about GCC
extensions[*], so I am not sure whether this is valid. But honestly, from the
description of -std=, I would understand that GNU extensions are
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-03-07 18:04 ---
Subject: Re: -std=c89 doesn't warn about gcc's ?: extension
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
The documentation says that you should use -pedantic to warn about GCC
extensions[*], so I am
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-07 18:11 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Subject: Re: -std=c89 doesn't warn about gcc's ?: extension
Where the standard specified with @option{-std} represents a GNU
extended dialect of C, such as @samp{gnu89} or @samp{gnu99},
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2007-03-07 21:06 ---
Subject: Re: -std=c89 doesn't warn about gcc's ?: extension
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Sorry, I still don't understand what is the difference between -std=c89 and
-std=gnu89.
10 matches
Mail list logo