--- Comment #10 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-04 19:50 ---
Fixed for trunk, expected to become GCC 4.5.0.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-01 17:05 ---
Subject: Bug 33466
Author: janis
Date: Wed Apr 1 17:04:42 2009
New Revision: 145417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=145417
Log:
libcpp/
PR c/33466
* expr.c
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-23 19:00 ---
Subject: Bug 33466
Author: janis
Date: Mon Feb 23 19:00:32 2009
New Revision: 144391
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=144391
Log:
PR c/33466
* expr.c (interpret_float_suffix):
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-23 19:05 ---
The checkin is for Joseph's c-4.5 branch. I'll move this to trunk after 4.4
branches.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33466
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-02-23 21:43 ---
Subject: Re: mixed-case suffix for decimal float constants
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Modified:
branches/c-4_5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-11 18:27 ---
N1169 says that the suffix for a fixed-point literal constant is case
insensitive, which to me means that uhk can be uhK/uHk/uHK/Uhk/UhK/UHk as well
as UHK. It's easier to implement that way, but if it's really
--- Comment #5 from tydeman at tybor dot com 2009-02-12 02:54 ---
The latest version of TR 18037 is WG14 document N1275 of 2007/10/01.
The suffix really is case insensitive, so 'uhk' has 8 variations.
'll' and 'LL' are not valid suffixes for fixed point constants.
--
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-10 21:50 ---
Suffixes for fixed-point constants are broken as well. GCC allows the letters
in them to be in any order, except that ll must be together and in the same
case. GCC does not reject 'l' by itself as invalid. N1169, a
--- Comment #1 from tydeman at tybor dot com 2009-01-31 15:29 ---
Problem still exists in gcc 4.3.2-7
--
tydeman at tybor dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
