--- Comment #7 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-12 04:24 ---
On i386-pc-solaris2.11 (OpenSolaris 2008.11) compiling gcc 4.4.0 20090104
I did NOT get this failure:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-01/msg00488.html
Now when I compile: gcc version 4.4.0 20090111
--- Comment #6 from dirtyepic at gentoo dot org 2008-12-07 06:42 ---
This is up to four failures now:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-structnest.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-structnest.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
(test for excess errors)
FAIL:
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-28 14:04 ---
The testcase has 10001 nested (), which is processed with recursive calls.
My default stack limit is 8MB. 10001 recursive calls need around 8MB stack.
Any changes in my setup will push it over the limit. I think we
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-27 22:28 ---
*** Bug 35717 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-27 23:08 ---
This test needs more than 8MB stack. I have
stacksize 8MB
Some kernel doesn't enforce it. When I set stack to unlimited,
it compiles fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35608
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-16 15:55 ---
What is the excess error (look in the gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log file)? usually
this test blows memory/stack, so possibly just gets killed by the kernel.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35608
--- Comment #2 from jrp at dial dot pipex dot com 2008-03-16 16:07 ---
PASS: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-structnest.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
Executing on host: /home/jrp/build/gcc/xgcc -B/home/jrp/build/gcc/ -O2 -w
-fn
o-show-column -c -o limits-structnest.o
