[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-14 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-14 08:10 --- (In reply to comment #9) Well, I guess then the first thing to ask for is for both the gcc.target/i386/opt-1.c and gcc.target/i386/opt-2.c tests to be extended so that they are run with -fPIC. It would be helpful

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-14 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-14 10:14 --- I confirm the opt-1/opt-2 failures on i686-linix and x86_64-linux when using -fpic or -fPIC: ... The issue is not darwin-specific. Digging the archives the failures on x86_64-linux when using -fpic or -fPIC

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-13 13:46 --- Can you try regressing r141079 and see if that suppresses the problem on -m32 for i686-apple-darwin9? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37106

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-13 14:13 --- To clarify are you saying that the offending revision is likely 141079 or 141077? Both have changes to alias.c. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37106

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-13 14:24 --- To clarify are you saying that the offending revision is likely 141079 or 141077? Both have changes to alias.c. Both revisions are the same: 141077 is for trunk (what I build and probably you also), 141079 is for

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-13 13:59 --- Can you try regressing r141079 ... This revision is for the ira-merge branch, the revision for trunk is r141077 and given the revision window and the fact that it cannot be r141078 since the failures did not appear

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #7 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-13 16:11 --- Can you try the failing test cases with -fno-PIC to see if these issues are related to the fact that darwin defaults to -fPIC? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37106

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-13 08:55 --- I now get the same error for gcc.target/i386/opt-1.c and opt-2.c also in 32 bit mode (default). This appeared between revision r141074 (with the patch for pr37808) and r141083. Note the ICE for

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-13 16:54 --- Can you try the failing test cases with -fno-PIC to see if these issues are related to the fact that darwin defaults to -fPIC? Apparently the tests pass with -fno-PIC in 32 bit mode but not with -m64:

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-10-13 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #9 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2008-10-13 17:13 --- Well, I guess then the first thing to ask for is for both the gcc.target/i386/opt-1.c and gcc.target/i386/opt-2.c tests to be extended so that they are run with -fPIC. It would be helpful to know if

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-08-27 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-08-27 09:25 --- This regression has been introduced between revisions 137991 and 138210. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37106

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37106

[Bug c/37106] [4.4 Regression] ICE: in mems_in_disjoint_alias_sets_p, at alias.c:278

2008-08-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Summary|ICE: in