[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2019-04-09 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|netbsd, SymbianOS, LynxOS,  |SymbianOS, LynxOS, QNX, TPF
   |QNX, TPF|

--- Comment #45 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to coypu from comment #44)
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #31)
> > GCC: some NetBSD targets (netbsd-stdint.h only used for x86 / x86_64), 
> 
> Speaking for NetBSD only:
> as of https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=253323 , we
> include netbsd-stdint.h for all netbsd targets.

OK, removing it from the target list then.

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2019-04-08 Thread coypu at sdf dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

--- Comment #44 from coypu  ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #31)
> GCC: some NetBSD targets (netbsd-stdint.h only used for x86 / x86_64), 

Speaking for NetBSD only:
as of https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=253323 , we
include netbsd-stdint.h for all netbsd targets.

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2019-04-08 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||coypu at sdf dot org

--- Comment #43 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #39)
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #38)
> > I think the correct state is NEW.  There is a well-defined set of target 
> > OSes that lack the target macro definitions describing those targets' 
> > stdint.h types, each of which should be straightforward to fix for someone 
> > with access to the target OS in question to examine its headers and run 
> > tests.
> 
> That's still these ones, right?
> 
> (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #31)
> > The following targets still appear to be missing this type information in 
> > GCC: some NetBSD targets (netbsd-stdint.h only used for x86 / x86_64), 
> > VxWorks, SymbianOS, LynxOS, QNX, TPF.  Others have either been fixed, or 
> > obsoleted and removed.
> 
> cc-ing maintainers of those ports

coypu at sdf dot org seems to be a de facto maintainer for NetBSD these days so
cc-ing them as well

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2019-04-06 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|netbsd, VxWorks, SymbianOS, |netbsd, SymbianOS, LynxOS,
   |LynxOS, QNX, TPF|QNX, TPF

--- Comment #42 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #40)
> The definitions have been added for VxWorks at some point.

(In reply to hain...@adacore.com from comment #41)
> > On 2 Jan 2019, at 23:33, joseph at codesourcery dot com 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448
> > 
> > --- Comment #40 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  > dot com> ---
> > The definitions have been added for VxWorks at some point.
> 
> Yes, https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg00761.html
> I think.

OK, removing it from the list of targets then

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2019-01-07 Thread hainque at adacore dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

--- Comment #41 from hainque at adacore dot com  ---
> On 2 Jan 2019, at 23:33, joseph at codesourcery dot com 
>  wrote:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448
> 
> --- Comment #40 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  dot com> ---
> The definitions have been added for VxWorks at some point.

Yes, https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg00761.html
I think.

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2019-01-02 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

--- Comment #40 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  ---
The definitions have been added for VxWorks at some point.

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2019-01-02 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|i686-pc-linux-gnu   |netbsd, VxWorks, SymbianOS,
   ||LynxOS, QNX, TPF
 CC||hainque at adacore dot com,
   ||kristerw at netbsd dot org,
   ||thorpej at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #39 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #38)
> I think the correct state is NEW.  There is a well-defined set of target 
> OSes that lack the target macro definitions describing those targets' 
> stdint.h types, each of which should be straightforward to fix for someone 
> with access to the target OS in question to examine its headers and run 
> tests.

That's still these ones, right?

(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #31)
> The following targets still appear to be missing this type information in 
> GCC: some NetBSD targets (netbsd-stdint.h only used for x86 / x86_64), 
> VxWorks, SymbianOS, LynxOS, QNX, TPF.  Others have either been fixed, or 
> obsoleted and removed.

cc-ing maintainers of those ports

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2018-03-26 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|2008-04-15 19:37:34 |2018-3-26

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2018-03-26 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

--- Comment #38 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  ---
I think the correct state is NEW.  There is a well-defined set of target 
OSes that lack the target macro definitions describing those targets' 
stdint.h types, each of which should be straightforward to fix for someone 
with access to the target OS in question to examine its headers and run 
tests.

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2018-03-23 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

--- Comment #37 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #36)
> I don't think this bug meets the definition of WAITING.

So what's the proper status for it then? SUSPENDED?

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2018-03-22 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

--- Comment #36 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  ---
I don't think this bug meets the definition of WAITING.

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2018-03-22 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

Eric Gallager  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #35 from Eric Gallager  ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #33)
> I think it's appropriate for this bug to track the missing pieces, whether 
> directly or through dependencies on a series of bugs for each target OS.

...so does it still need to stay in WAITING then?

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2017-02-03 Thread vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

Dominik Vogt  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com

--- Comment #34 from Dominik Vogt  ---
A __typeof__-Problem on s390x:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79358

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2017-01-24 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

--- Comment #33 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  ---
I think it's appropriate for this bug to track the missing pieces, whether 
directly or through dependencies on a series of bugs for each target OS.

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2017-01-24 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

--- Comment #32 from Martin Sebor  ---
Thanks.  I wonder if the incomplete support on those targets should be handled
as separate bug reports raised by users if/when they run into problems.  That
way this large bug could be closed as resolved.  Would that work for you?

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2017-01-24 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

--- Comment #31 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  ---
The following targets still appear to be missing this type information in 
GCC: some NetBSD targets (netbsd-stdint.h only used for x86 / x86_64), 
VxWorks, SymbianOS, LynxOS, QNX, TPF.  Others have either been fixed, or 
obsoleted and removed.

[Bug c/448] -related issues (C99 issues)

2017-01-24 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=448

Martin Sebor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING
 CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #30 from Martin Sebor  ---
Is anything still outstanding here or can the bug be resolved as fixed?