http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-10-18 15:11:54 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18
16:12:21 UTC ---
Does anyone honestly expect a pre-processor macro to change due to
attributes on a function? I sure don't -- that would seem to be a
clear translation phase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18
16:21:31 UTC ---
Yes, though the issue originally came up in terms of the pragma and not the
attribute, because people wanted to include the various include files that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18
20:01:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 22083
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22083
Patch that redefines mode_has_fma so that it works with -save-temps
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18
22:37:36 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Oct 18 22:37:32 2010
New Revision: 165666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165666
Log:
Fix PR 46041
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-16
09:43:25 UTC ---
Hm, the question is if it is a good idea anyway given the target and
optimization
attributes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-15
22:59:10 UTC ---
Doesn't that mean -save-temps is also broken?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-15
23:01:19 UTC ---
I think the easiest solution is to simply do
switch (mode)
{
case SFmode:
#ifdef HAVE_fmasf4
return HAVE_fmasf4;
#endif
break;
...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-15
23:02:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Doesn't that mean -save-temps is also broken?
Yes.
11 matches
Mail list logo