http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
Andrew Haley aph at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-16
15:24:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
That is what the built_in_decls vs. implicit_built_in_decls distinction is
for.
Except that for sincos, being a POSIX but not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-12-16 15:30:17 UTC ---
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Hum. We generate calls to sincos() if TARGET_HAS_SINCOS is true and a call
to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13
17:23:05 UTC ---
I think this is invalid as GNU/Linux defaults to including sincos as a builtin.
If you want to disable the builtin then use -fno-builtin-sincos.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
--- Comment #2 from James Kuyper Jr. jameskuyper at verizon dot net
2010-12-13 18:41:55 UTC ---
info gcc says:
Functions which would normally be built in but do not have
semantics defined by ISO C (such as `alloca' and `ffs') are not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2010-12-13 18:48:22 UTC ---
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
I think this is invalid as GNU/Linux defaults to including sincos as a
