https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
--- Comment #15 from Dave Pagan ---
Thanks, Paolo!
On 06/28/2018 01:44 AM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
>
> Paolo Carlini changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Jun 28 08:42:17 2018
New Revision: 262215
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262215=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-06-28 David Pagan
PR c/55976
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
--- Comment #12 from Dave Pagan ---
New test pr55976-1.c is failing due to unaccounted for extraneous output from
the compiler. Test requires addition of dg-prune-output. Adding the directive
and will send patch shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed May 30 22:55:38 2018
New Revision: 260978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260978=gcc=rev
Log:
2018-05-30 David Pagan
PR c/55976
* c-decl.c (grokdeclarator):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Dave Pagan from comment #6)
> Helpful update, Jonathan - did you want to follow up on this bug then? Or
> should I go ahead based on your new information?
I missed this reply, sorry. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Dave Pagan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from Dave Pagan ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dave.pagan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
My advice would be to create a new option Wreturn-pedantic. Make this
option control the pedwarns that don't have any option. Then, enable it by
default, but also make it be enabled by Wpedantic and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
--- Comment #6 from Dave Pagan ---
Helpful update, Jonathan - did you want to follow up on this bug then? Or
should I go ahead based on your new information?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Dave Pagan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.pagan at oracle dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bastien.penavayre at epitech
dot e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
15 matches
Mail list logo
