https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> Agree with Joseph, but it's a low priority on my list. It's kind of error
> recovery and as soon you fix the first warning you should not see the second
> one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Agree with Joseph, but it's a low priority on my list. It's kind of error
recovery and as soon you fix the first warning you should not see the second
one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think it would be appropriate for the front end to generate something
for return ; that avoids this warning. I don't know whether
that should be a literal return of error_mark_node, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #7)
> If CC:ing me on a bug, please always state the specific question on which
> you want an opinion; don't CC me simply because I maintain the relevant
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
If CC:ing me on a bug, please always state the specific question on which
you want an opinion; don't CC me simply because I maintain the relevant
part of the compiler (I read gcc-bugs) or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Thanks for CC. Patches are currently under review.
> About this PR: as 'b' is undeclared, the whole statement with the expression
> is ignored and we have:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Thanks for CC. Patches are currently under review.
About this PR: as 'b' is undeclared, the whole statement with the expression is
ignored and we have:
(gdb) p debug_function(cfun->decl, 0)
f (int a)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60440
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
11 matches
Mail list logo
