https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov ---
Code in comment #0 is also valid, it's just rather questionable (the octal
literal is \00) and most likely unintended (or intentionally misleading).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952
David Brown changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at westcontrol dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov ---
Bah, please disregard the last point; '\9' is diagnosed similar to "\9".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70952
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov ---
Octal escapes have no more than three digits by definition, so "\0009" clearly
doesn't fall under this warning.
Upon further testing, there's no diagnostic for
const char c = '\9'; /* same as ... = 9;
