[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

2023-12-01 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

2023-11-30 Thread fw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

2023-11-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Florian Weimer : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532 commit r14-6034-g4ee2aca7ca098cc6e622a9a41e63224af37e6532 Author: Florian Weimer Date:

[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

2023-05-19 Thread muecker at gwdg dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 Martin Uecker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||muecker at gwdg dot de --- Comment #3

[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

2022-07-27 Thread fw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- It seems that auto x = 1.0; will change meaning in C2X (as implemented by GCC) and use type double instead of int for x. We are probably way too late to fix this (by rejecting the construct in earlier

[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

2020-01-27 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/91093] Error on implicit int by default

2019-07-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91093 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org See