https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On August 10, 2019 4:22:25 AM GMT+02:00, peter at cordes dot ca
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
>
>Peter Cordes changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter at cordes dot ca
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
--- Comment #3 from ead ---
Thank you for the expanations and your time!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91398
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
ABI question: is a function that returns a value through such a hidden
pointer required not to write anything to the storage pointed to until it
knows that it will definitely be returning
