[Bug debug/53770] Regression: incorrect line numbers in debug info since 4.5+

2015-02-09 Thread petschy at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53770 --- Comment #3 from petschy at gmail dot com --- Tried now w/ g++ 4.9.1 (Debian 4.9.1-19), and single stepping is still wrong. The only difference is that it doesn't stop on ++f in line 30 after breaking out from the loop. However, all the other

[Bug debug/53770] Regression: incorrect line numbers in debug info since 4.5+

2015-02-09 Thread petschy at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53770 --- Comment #4 from petschy at gmail dot com --- Clarification: I double checked now, and the templated and the non-templated versions (do_print vs do_print2) are the same, with the same disassembly, only the addresses differing. This is true for

[Bug debug/53770] Regression: incorrect line numbers in debug info since 4.5+

2015-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53770 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug debug/53770] Regression: incorrect line numbers in debug info since 4.5+

2012-06-25 Thread petschy at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53770 --- Comment #1 from petschy at gmail dot com 2012-06-25 20:29:05 UTC --- I tested on 32bit Debian Wheezy, too, with stock 4.6.3, and everything was ok. Another AMD64 Wheezy box w/ stock 4.6.3 showed the bug, with a minor variation: when the