http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #31 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-24 12:45:44 UTC ---
--- Comment #30 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23
16:49:05 UTC ---
Is it still a regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-21 10:07:02 UTC ---
--- Comment #28 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18
11:08:06 UTC ---
Is the mem-clobbering
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #27 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18
10:58:43 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Jan 18 10:58:15 2013
New Revision: 195291
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195291
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #28 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18
11:08:06 UTC ---
Is the mem-clobbering compile-time regression still noticeable after the recent
patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
08:52:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 3 08:52:10 2013
New Revision: 194834
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194834
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #25 from Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com 2012-12-24
00:37:18 UTC ---
55793 may be a duplicate, but the testcase is really different.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-13 13:12:00 UTC ---
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-12
22:21:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 28942
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-12 11:07:21 UTC ---
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10
10:56:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #20 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-12 11:10:03
UTC ---
Created attachment 28935
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28935
sparc-sun-solaris2.10 testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-12
22:09:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 28941
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28941
sparc hack
I think on SPARC that is partly the fault of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-12
22:21:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 28942
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28942
--param max-vartrack-reverse-op-size patch
Another patch, to avoid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28563|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-10
10:56:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Not on Solaris/SPARC, unfortunately: there are still compilations in the
libgo testsuite that take more than a day, which
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-06 16:56:35 UTC ---
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06
16:41:45 UTC ---
Improvements so that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-06
17:00:35 UTC ---
I don't see the #c0 testcase particularly slow, I'm afraid we won't get rid of
all the slowdowns caused by the memory invalidation checking in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-05
07:58:52 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 5 07:58:48 2012
New Revision: 193152
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193152
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-30 10:58:48 UTC ---
With Jakub's patch the testcase mentioned in comment 2:
http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=9362action=edit
now takes 2:30 minutes to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-30 11:24:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
With Jakub's patch the testcase mentioned in comment 2:
http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=9362action=edit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-30 12:25:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=9362action=edit
now takes 2:30 minutes to compile (up from 1:40).
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-30
18:24:17 UTC ---
IMHO it is really not useful to dup together completely unrelated var-tracking
PRs together.
test-tgmath.i clearly has nothing to do with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
17:24:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 28563
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28563
gcc48-pr54402-2.patch
Just for completeness, I'm attaching my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-10-27 07:23:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
As Uros says in bug 54507, the reflect test from libgo is another example.
Actually, on alpha it is text/template test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-16 14:42:32 UTC ---
Another example is math/test-tgmath2.c from glibc.
(after compiling for 1:40 minutes):
test-tgmath2.c: In function ‘test’:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-10-16 18:38:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 28458
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28458
glibc math testcase
Please note that gcc-4.6 and 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
32 matches
Mail list logo
