http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
Andreas Tobler andreast at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #20 from Andreas Tobler andreast at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-17
12:36:16 UTC ---
Just for clarification, the following commits (after #14) in this PR did not
resolve the bootstrap issue. I was on r193501 when I first encountered
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #21 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-18
01:56:04 UTC ---
This doesn't look like something the bugfix may have caused, but rather as some
latent bug exposed by that patch, like the latent bug fixed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-06
17:59:04 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Nov 6 17:58:52 2012
New Revision: 193251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193251
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07
07:50:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 7 07:50:01 2012
New Revision: 193281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193281
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-04
18:44:18 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sun Nov 4 18:44:13 2012
New Revision: 193138
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193138
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-04
18:44:32 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sun Nov 4 18:44:25 2012
New Revision: 193139
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193139
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-30
23:47:44 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Oct 30 23:47:35 2012
New Revision: 193003
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193003
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
19:26:21 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:26:16 2012
New Revision: 192957
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192957
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
19:27:11 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:27:09 2012
New Revision: 192958
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192958
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
19:27:39 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:27:31 2012
New Revision: 192959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192959
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
19:36:52 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:36:47 2012
New Revision: 192961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192961
Log:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
19:37:31 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:37:25 2012
New Revision: 192962
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=192962
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-19
12:34:14 UTC ---
Thanks, the threadedge patch looks reasonable (I think gimple_location on debug
stmts is ignored, so we don't need to drop it).
As for ivopts, there
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-19
13:49:03 UTC ---
What I had in mind for ivopts is roughly this. Not sure about the last
argument to get_computation_at. For normal statements I'd hope it shouldn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-14
21:19:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 28447
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28447
Work in progress patch
This patch improves jump threading so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-04
06:09:48 UTC ---
As a quick hack just for this testcase we might perhaps do something in jump
threading code, if we have a DEBUG stmt based on a PHI result and are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-01
15:26:10 UTC ---
In VRP it is jump threading that performs the first CFG transformation, and the
second one happens as two merge_block opportunities during
21 matches
Mail list logo
