http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-15
07:06:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 15 07:06:49 2013
New Revision: 196672
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196672
Log:
PR debug/56307
* gcc.dg/tree-s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #15 from John David Anglin 2013-03-14
23:46:18 UTC ---
Adding -fvar-tracking -fvar-tracking-assignments results in the following
warning on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11:
spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-13
14:33:07 UTC ---
Ah yes, I forgot that all of -fvar-tracking is disabled for non-dwarf debug.
Yeah, passing -fvar-tracking -fvar-tracking-assignments in dg-options is
desirable for that test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-03-13 01:50:05 UTC ---
On 12-Mar-13, at 1:48 PM, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I'm just guessing, but is it possible that MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_STMTS is 0
>
> even with -g on hppa-hpux?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-03-12 18:27:01 UTC ---
On 3/12/2013 1:59 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I think -fvar-tracking-assignments is disabled by default if selective
>
> scheduler is enabled, but I doub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor 2013-03-12
17:48:15 UTC ---
I'm just guessing, but is it possible that MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_STMTS is 0
even with -g on hppa-hpux? If so, that (and I suppose the debug
format) would be the cause and skipping/xfa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2013-03-12
14:53:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 29654
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29654
Tree dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2013-03-12
14:52:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 29653
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29653
Tree dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2013-03-12
08:32:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I can reproduce the failure with a i686-apple-darwin9 cross
> to hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
Can you please attach -fdump-tree-ealias-slim and
-fdump-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2013-03-11
01:10:43 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Mar 11 01:10:38 2013
New Revision: 196591
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196591
Log:
PR debug/56307
* gcc.dg/t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2013-03-09
22:49:13 UTC ---
So, this is probably a debug format issue.
Will xfail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2013-02-18
10:55:32 UTC ---
Probably not because s is a local variable, not a parameter and the
only function parameter in the testcase is an integer. Unfortunately,
I cannot reproduce the failure on hppa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
---
15 matches
Mail list logo
