[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2018-07-31 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 --- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > AFAIK Kevin Buettner has the GDB support for it pretty much written but not > yet submitted. Mentioned this at

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2018-07-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yes, since r251949, because gfortran changed ABI. That doesn't mean DW_OP_GNU_variable_value isn't emitted in other cases, and AFAIK Kevin Buettner has the GDB support for it pretty much written but not yet

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2018-07-31 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2017-02-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2017-02-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 25 08:18:24 2017 New Revision: 245733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245733=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/77589 include/ * dwarf2.def (DW_OP_GNU_variable_value):

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2017-02-08 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2016-11-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2016-09-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > So DW_OP_GNU_implicit_ptr doesn't work here? Not sure > I understand how DW_OP_GNU_implicit_ptr works fully. That is, > > ... *(D#1 + 24) >

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2016-09-15 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2016-09-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug debug/77589] [6/7 Regression] fortran: Missing DW_AT_byte_stride for an array record field selection

2016-09-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|