https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8354
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-12-28 06:14:12 |2024-1-23
--- Comment #14 from Richard
--- Comment #13 from gary at intrepid dot com 2007-01-09 17:40 ---
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2007-01/msg00147.html
From: Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com
To: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:01:38 -0800
Subject: RE: how to support C type qualifiers
--- Comment #12 from gary at intrepid dot com 2007-01-01 22:47 ---
Jim Wilson posted thi follow up to the GDB list:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2007-01/msg7.html
From: Jim Wilson wilson at specifix dot com
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2007 14:15:47 -0800
Subject: RE: how to support C
--- Comment #11 from gary at intrepid dot com 2006-12-30 06:34 ---
I looked into fixing GCC's DWARF 2
generation for types that are qualified (for example, const
and volatile, and in the case of UPC, shared, strict,
and relaxed) in order to ensure that GDB has an accurate
understanding
--- Comment #10 from gary at intrepid dot com 2006-11-28 00:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=12702)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12702action=view)
PR/8354 patch discussion thread
As reported in Bug #20588, the referenced links to the gcc-patch mailing list
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28
23:54 ---
Here is the corrected link
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-02/msg01995.html
or follow the link to the patch and click on followups.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8354
