[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

2018-12-10 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 --- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Tanaya Patil from comment #7) > Should we expect this fix to be in Binutil 2.32? Yes. :-)

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

2018-12-10 Thread tanaya_patil at persistent dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 Tanaya Patil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tanaya_patil at persistent dot com ---

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

2018-12-07 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

2018-12-07 Thread nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Fri Dec 7 10:33:30 2018 New Revision: 266886 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266886=gcc=rev Log: Add a recursion limit to libiberty's demangling code. The limit is enabled by

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

2018-11-30 Thread N1705695H at e dot ntu.edu.sg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 --- Comment #4 from N1705695H at e dot ntu.edu.sg --- (In reply to Scott Gayou from comment #3) > My last comment was a bit confusing. I can reproduce 2/3 on a standard > system, and the other 1/3 requires dropping ulimit -s down a bit. (to

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

2018-11-27 Thread sgayou at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 --- Comment #3 from Scott Gayou --- My last comment was a bit confusing. I can reproduce 2/3 on a standard system, and the other 1/3 requires dropping ulimit -s down a bit. (to 4096).

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

2018-11-27 Thread sgayou at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 Scott Gayou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgayou at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug demangler/87675] Stack Overflow in function next_is_type_qual() in cp-demangle.c, as demonstrated by "nm -C"

2018-10-29 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1