https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92797
--- Comment #7 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to ibuclaw from comment #4)
> > At what point does the D demangler kick in? It should only attempt to parse
> > symbols that begin with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92797
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #4)
> At what point does the D demangler kick in? It should only attempt to parse
> symbols that begin with '_D'.
Huh? D mangles symbols also starting with _Z. Why do you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92797
--- Comment #5 from Tim Ruehsen ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #4)
> At what point does the D demangler kick in? It should only attempt to parse
> symbols that begin with '_D'.
There is a reproducer attached. See my initial comment on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92797
--- Comment #4 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
At what point does the D demangler kick in? It should only attempt to parse
symbols that begin with '_D'.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92797
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92797
--- Comment #3 from Tim Ruehsen ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Tim Ruehsen from comment #1)
> > BTW, llvm-cxxfilt does not show this behavior.
>
> Could it because it does not implement the D demangler?
Good
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92797
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tim Ruehsen from comment #1)
> BTW, llvm-cxxfilt does not show this behavior.
Could it because it does not implement the D demangler?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92797
--- Comment #1 from Tim Ruehsen ---
BTW, llvm-cxxfilt does not show this behavior.
