https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #24 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Riccardo Mutschlechner from comment #21)
> Not sure if this is the best place to start, but here goes. I've noticed
> another similar issue.
>
> Let's say you've compiled a binary, `test`, from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
sarvel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sarvelgcc at outlook dot com
--- Comment #23 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #22 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Riccardo Mutschlechner from comment #21)
> Is this cruft, or something that would actually be used - and if so, what is
> a good way to go about doing this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Gett
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Riccardo Mutschlechner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||riccardo at cs dot wisc.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||_paul at bk dot ru
--- Comment #20 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yongjin.ohn at lge dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 19 18:11:54 2014
New Revision: 217789
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217789&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR driver/36312
PR driver/63837
* gcc.c (process_command): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to carlos from comment #15)
> It would be sufficient if /dev/null were special cased in some way for Linux
> configurations.
There is a pre-approved patch here
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
carlos at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Author: manu
Date: Tue Nov 11 23:33:25 2014
New Revision: 217391
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217391&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-11-11 Anthony Brandon
Manu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Author: manu
Date: Wed Nov 5 22:17:22 2014
New Revision: 217159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217159&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert revision 217149 because it breaks Ada:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #10 from Wojciech Koszek ---
I'm very happy seeing it in GCC.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:24 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
>
> --- Comment #8 from Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Author: manu
Date: Wed Nov 5 17:23:46 2014
New Revision: 217149
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217149&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-11-05 Anthony Brandon
PR driv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wkoszek at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
--- Comment #5 from sam at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-07 10:53 ---
A warning would be of no use, as it would be too late to recover the input
file. Having GCC refuse to run in this case would be great.
--
sam at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from shoaib dot jameel at gmail dot com 2008-05-23 17:05
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I didn't lose anything - the internet backs up for me.
THe problem with me is rather grave. I dont even have a backup. Any method by
which I can recover the source code? I need the co
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-23 17:01 ---
I didn't lose anything - the internet backs up for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #2 from shoaib dot jameel at gmail dot com 2008-05-23 16:48
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Happened to me as well.
any remedy...so as to recover the lost C codes?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-23 16:41 ---
Happened to me as well.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
24 matches
Mail list logo
